Friday, 11 September 2015
Friday, 4 September 2015
The Religious Art of Andy Warhol
Dillenberger points out that there was "another Andy, a private Andy, who is stunningly opposite to his public persona. This Andy is shy, reclusive and religious."(Dillenberger p 11) She goes on to say that only his closest friends knew of his spiritual side. He seemed to be the antithesis of spiritual but that side of him existed and gives his art another dimension.
Before his death, Warhol worked on a cycle of paintings that had religious content and references. The image he projected as being cool, immoral and amoral, avariciously entrepreneurial, voyeuristic, obsessed with money, fame and glamour hid another side that grappled with concepts about piety, religiosity and ethics.
Andy was born into a fervently Catholic family, following what was called Ruska Dolina, the Rutheran section of Pittsburgh. When young, he was withdrawn and reclusive, devout and celibate.
His mother, Julia, had a huge influence on him.
Was his air of detachment - the distance he displayed between the world and himself - a reflection of his reserve; a persona he developed as an artist or an ironic caricature of Cool?
Andy's religion didn't surface in his work until a few years before his death. He embarked on a series of Last Suppers using as inspiration a cheap, kitsch mock-up of Leonardo's masterpiece he bought on Times Square. His use of Pop art to re-energise sacred subjects was revolutionary. His canvases sported slogans like Jesus Saves and Heaven and Hell Are Just One Breath Away!
Leonardo da Vinci, The Last Supper, 1498. Tempera on prepared stone wall, 180x342 in.
Andy created many paintings based on Leonardo's famous The Last Supper which is a fresco on the wall in the refectory of Santa dell Grazie in Milan. I saw this fresco in 1973 before the crowds and restoration teams had descended on it.
"The image, of course, is part of popular culture, reproduced in every size and medium, including an imaginative variety of kitsch Last Suppers in exuberantly bad taste, some with changing colours and others painted in black velvet". (Dillenberger p 79)
There was a family connection to this image of Leonardo's The Last Supper. A reproduction hung on the walls of the kitchen where the Warhola family had their meals in their immigrant home in Pittsburgh. Warhol's devout mother had a small coloured reproduction in her worn and often used Old Slavonic Prayer Book.
In Warhol's The Last Supper (Dove), above, three logos are superimposed over the sacred drawing. These are commercial logos: the corner price tag of 59 cents; the Dove soap logo and the General Electric logo. It is ironic to see these commercial icons juxtaposed with the sacred icon. Is Andy Warhol saying that the hackneyed image of The Last Supper has been reduced to popular culture and that the logos and Leonardo's over used image are now on the same plane? Is the use of the price tag a way of suggesting that money is God today? Is it a critique of dumbing down, commercialising higher ideals or cheapening valuable belief systems?
What are these marketing symbols doing obscuring the sacred, narrative image of The Last Supper?
Does the price tag say that everything can be purchased or that not everything can be purchased? Or perhaps 59c in 1986 when Warhol painted this would not have bought much, pointing to the devalued religious images. The painting is playful. If you didn't know that Warhol was a believer, you might read it as an atheistic critique of religion exposing its business-like goals whilst drawing people in with false promises and false values.
Dillenberger, whose book shows us Andy's devout side, suggests that the Dove soap reference coupled with the GE from packaged light bulbs denotes cleanliness and power; "Cleanliness is next to Godliness". The dove levitating above the head of Jesus alludes to the baptism of Jesus by John the Baptist: "the heaven was opened, and the Holy Spirit descending upon (Jesus) in bodily form like a dove" (Luke 3:21-22).
She says: "As for GE, "we bring good things to light" can be seen as a metaphor for creation, when God separated light and darkness and found his creation to be "good": God brings good things to light. GE as a symbol for the creator, the dove for the Holy Spirit, and Jesus here delineated at the Last Supper - the three make up the Holy Trinity. The Trinity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit is a theological concept that is particularly significant in the Byzantine Catholic Church." (Dillenberger p 93)
Friday, 19 June 2015
32b) CROATIA'S HIDDEN HOLOCAUST
OPINION
By MICHAEL FREUND \
05/30/2013 16:01
Time to confront Croatia’s hidden Holocaust
Ultimately, the Ustashe murdered more than 30,000 Jews, or 75 percent of the country’s prewar Jewish community.
The move will mark the culmination of a grueling decade long process, one in which the former Yugoslav republic had to implement widespread changes in a number of fields – ranging from intellectual property law to the free movement of capital – to bring itself in line with accepted EU practice.
But however much the Balkan state may have tweaked its legal system and upgraded its food safety and environmental protection standards, there is one thing Croatia has demonstrably failed to do: come to terms with its disgraceful record of mass murder during World War II.
Most of us are aware of camps such as Birkenau, Dachau, Treblinka and Bergen-Belsen, where the Germans and their henchmen systematically slaughtered millions of innocents.
But how many of us have heard of Jasenovac or the horrors that were perpetrated there by Croatian fascists? Known as “the Auschwitz of the Balkans,” it was the largest of a network of camps established by the independent state of Croatia, which the Nazis set up on April 10, 1941.
Hitler assigned the task of ruling Croatia to Ante Pavelic, head of the fascist Ustashe movement, which vowed to rid the country of Serbs, Jews and other minorities.
Following in the Germans’ footsteps, Pavelic passed racial laws against the Jews, imposed restrictions on their freedom of movement and banned them from various professions.
Ultimately, the Ustashe murdered more than 30,000 Jews, or 75 percent of the country’s prewar Jewish community.
But it was the two million Serbs then living in Croatia who were the primary targets of Pavelic and his quislings.
With a bloodlust rivaled only by that of their Nazi patrons, the Ustashe set about the task of “cleansing” Croatian soil by torching Serb villages, beheading priests and herding Serbian worshipers into Orthodox churches before setting them alight. Over 200,000 Serbs were forcibly converted to Catholicism, with the active help and encouragement of the Archbishop of Zagreb, Aloysius Stepinac.
But it was at the Jasenovac camp that the Croats unleashed their most bestial cruelty, by many accounts killing at least several hundred thousand people in an orgy of indescribable savagery.
Jasenovac had no gas chambers or murder machines, so each killing had to be carried out the old-fashioned way: with knives, bars, axes or even hammers.
If Auschwitz was the epitome of mechanized murder, Jasenovac was the embodiment of manually orchestrated massacre.
In an interview that appeared earlier this month in the Serbian newspaper Politika, Jasa Almuli, a 95-year old author and journalist who previously served as president of the Belgrade Jewish community, described Jasenovac as “barbaric,” saying that “the murders were predominantly carried out manually.”
“Very seldom did they use bullets,” he said, “because they believed the victims ‘didn’t merit it.’” Almuli went on to describe some of the Ustashe’s methods, which included cutting out the eyes of their victims and slitting their throats, throwing live prisoners into brick furnaces and poisoning children.
The Ustashe even employed a special knife they called a “Srbosjek”, or “Serb-cutter,” to slaughter as many Serbs as possible.
There are numerous detailed accounts of the malevolence that was perpetrated at the camp. Eduard Sajer, a Jew from southeastern Bosnia and Herzegovina, was imprisoned in Jasenovac in November 1941. His parents and four of his five siblings were murdered there, and in an interview for the US Holocaust Memorial Museum, he recounted some of the Ustashe’s chilling practices, which included the use of blowtorches and welding rods for torturing inmates.
Sajer also described how his younger brother was bludgeoned to death by Croatian guards with a sledgehammer before his own eyes, and how he watched in horror as a group of Jews from Sarajevo were burned alive.
After the war and the establishment of Communist Yugoslavia, the camp was bulldozed and Yugoslav leader Josip Broz Tito sought to suppress the story of Jasenovac because he didn’t want it getting in the way of creating a new Yugoslav identity.
As a result, Croats were not forced to come to terms with their past or their dark deeds, a reality that continued even after the demise of Yugoslavia and Croatian independence.
Indeed, even though Croatian leaders have traveled to Jerusalem to offer words of apology at the Knesset, the legacy of the Ustashe remains very much alive and even admired among some Croats.
For example, a year and a half ago, in December 2011, large memorial masses were held in two Catholic churches in the Croatian cities of Zagreb and Split for Ustashe leader Pavelic, despite the fact that he was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent people.
Can you imagine a similar event taking place in Rome for Mussolini or in Berlin for Hitler? One of the most popular musical groups in Croatia, the Thompson rock band, has drawn tens of thousands to its concerts, where many young people have come proudly dressed in Ustashe uniforms. The band has also included Ustashe slogans in some of its songs, and has even sung lyrics calling for the elimination of Serbs.
A key part of the problem lies in the fact that the memorial museum erected by Croatia at the Jasenovac site seems to have been deliberately designed to obfuscate the true nature of what took place there.
According to Dr. Efraim Zuroff of the Simon Wiesenthal Center, the exhibition at Jasenovac is an “educational disaster.” He says that it “speaks of the Ustashe without explaining who they are or even what their ideology was,” and that it does not even contain any photos of the Ustashe commanders of the camp or those who perpetrated the mass murder.
“If they don’t teach properly about what the Ustashe did at Jasenovac,” Zuroff told me, “one can only imagine what they are teaching in the schools in Croatia.”
A few weeks ago, a former board member of the Jasenovac museum also raised serious concerns about the nature of the exhibition. In a letter addressed to foreign ambassadors in Zagreb, Julija Kos said that the museum display presented a false image of what took place, calling it “blurred” and “systematic in avoiding a clear presentation of the information.” For over seven years, Kos wrote, she had “persistently pleaded with high government officials to do something to fix the problem,” but they had refused.
With Croatia marching forward into the arms of Europe, now is the time to compel Zagreb to confront its sinister past. History and its lessons cannot and must not be squelched, regardless of whether it is politically convenient.
The Croatian authorities need to drastically revise the memorial at Jasenovac and stop hiding behind blurry language. Bans should be imposed on holding memorial services for Ustashe officials, and Holocaust education should be made a priority in Croatia’s schools.
At a time of rising extremism and anti-Semitism across the continent, it is essential that Croatia’s hidden Holocaust, as embodied at Jasenovac, not be shunted aside.
Europe is still in a position to make these demands, and it should not shy away from doing so.
That is the least they can do in memory of the hundreds of thousands of innocent Jews, Serbs, Gypsies and others who were slaughtered there.
Monday, 15 June 2015
19c) Yugoslavia during the Shoah
(from: www.yadvashem.org)
Country in southeastern Europe, established after World War I with the union of several territories housing many different ethnic groups. Yugoslavia's hub was Serbia, joined by Montenegro, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Macedonia, and other areas.
Before the outbreak of World War II, 15.5 million people lived in Yugoslavia. Of that number, 43 percent were Serbs, 34 percent were Croats, seven percent Slovenes, and seven percent Macedonians. The rest of the population consisted of Germans, Hungarians, Albanians, Gypsies, and approximately 80,000 Jews.
Before Hitler came to power in Germany, there was not much Antisemitism in Yugoslavia. However, as Nazi Germany began to systematically persecute German Jews, antisemitism in Yugoslavia also mounted. After the war broke out, the Yugoslav government wanted to appease the Germans, so it passed two anti-Jewish laws in October 1940. The first law fixed a quota for Jews entering secondary schools and universities; the second banned Jews from buying and selling certain food items. Intellectuals and the Serbian public strenuously objected to these laws, to no avail.
On April 13, 1941 Germany, along with Italy, Hungary, and Bulgaria, invaded Yugoslavia. By April 18 the Yugoslav army surrendered. Hitler decided to do away with the political entity of Yugoslavia, and divide it among his allies. Germany took Serbia; Bulgaria annexed Macedonia; and Hungary, the Backa region. Italy was given Montenegro and most of Yugoslavia's Adriatic coast. Croatia, Bosnia, and Herzegovina were united into the Independent State of Croatia, under the control of the Ustasa fascist nationalist movement.
Yugoslavia's population of 80,000 Jews consisted of 40,000 in Croatia, 16,000 in Serbia, 16,000 in the Backa region, and 8,000 in Macedonia. How they were treated after the Germans invaded in 1941 depended on the region.
In Serbia, the Germans dealt with the region's Jews thoroughly, quickly, and cruelly. Right after they took over Serbia, they ordered the Jews to register themselves, and enacted anti-Jewish laws. For the next few months, most male Jews were forced to work at hard labor. After a Serbian revolt broke out
__________________________________________________________________________ 1/2 Shoah Resource Center, The International School for Holocaust Studies
The Jews of Croatia were persecuted as part of a general Genocide of foreigners, including Serbs, Jews, and Gypsies. Jewish property and money were taken away, and by the end of 1941 about two-thirds of Croatia's Jews had been imprisoned. Many were killed by the Ustasa government. Most of the rest of Croatia's Jews were deported to Auschwitz or other concentration camps in the east. Some were able to escape to the Italian zone of Yugoslavia.
Macedonia was ruled by Bulgaria. In March 1943 Germany convinced Bulgaria to arrest the region's Jews and deport them to Treblinka. More than 7,000 Macedonian Jews were killed, and less than 1,000 survived.
Hungary had annexed the Backa region, and subjected it to its own anti- Jewish laws. In January 1942 the Hungarian army and police went on the "great raid," in which they murdered and plundered Backa's Jews. They then forced the young Jews to work at hard labor, and concentrated the rest of the Jews in three camps. In 1944 more than 10,000 Jews were deported to Auschwitz.
Those Jews who lived in Montenegro or on Yugoslavia's Adriatic coast were the lucky ones. The Italian government, army, and foreign ministry worked together to protect their Jews from the Germans. They did so on principle, because they realized that the Germans were losing the war, and because they wanted to preserve their admired status in Yugoslavia. About 5,000 Jews were saved by the Italians.
Altogether, about 66,000 Yugoslav Jews were killed in the Holocaust, and altogether about one million Yugoslavians died in World War II.










































































